Oracle Is Spending Tens of Billions on AI Infrastructure. Where Does the Physical Money Go?

Oracle Is Spending Tens of Billions on AI Infrastructure. Where Does the Physical Money Go?

Habib Ur Rehman

Sat, September 12, 2026 at 1:47 AM GMT+3 3 min read

• ORCL -1.74%
• VRT +3.60%

Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) spent $28.5 billion on capital expenditures in its latest quarter as it raced to build cloud capacity for artificial intelligence. Vertiv Holdings Co. (NYSE:VRT) operates one layer below that boom, where GPUs become a power and cooling problem.

Oracle reported September 10 that quarterly revenue rose 30% to $19.3 billion and remaining performance obligations reached $664 billion, driven by more than $30 billion of new AI contracts.

The second-order question is what happens physically when cloud providers build that much capacity. Dense AI racks require power conversion, cooling and switchgear, while grid constraints are increasingly pushing data-center operators toward onsite generation. Vertiv specializes in the power and cooling infrastructure around those systems and is expanding further into onsite power.

For illustration purposes only. Photo by Brett Sayles on Pexels

Oracle's Capex Has to Earn Its Keep

Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) has a bull case built around enormous infrastructure spending already translating into cloud growth and contracted demand. Customer prepayments also reduce some of the financing pressure.

Its bear case is return on capital. Building an AI data center is economically attractive only if future utilization and pricing justify today's construction costs.

Vertiv Sells Into the Bottleneck

Vertiv Holdings Co. (NYSE:VRT) reinforced that strategy September 2 by agreeing to acquire Utility Innovation Group for about $1.45 billion in cash plus as much as $1.15 billion of contingent payments. The acquisition adds microgrid controls, switchgear and onsite-power capabilities designed to help data centers reach operation faster when utility grids cannot deliver enough electricity.

Vertiv's bull case is more vendor-neutral. It does not need Oracle to win against Microsoft or Amazon. It needs data centers, whoever owns them, to keep increasing rack density and power demand. The industry's obsession with "time to first token" directly increases the value of reliable power and cooling.

The bearish case is valuation and cyclicality. Infrastructure suppliers eventually feel hyperscaler spending pauses, and today's market assumes AI data-center investment remains elevated for years.

Hedge-fund sentiment strengthened for both companies in Q2. Oracle ownership increased to 119 funds from 115, while Vertiv rose to 112 from 96. Short interest was roughly 2.8% of Oracle's float and 3.4% of Vertiv's as of August 14. Vertiv short interest actually increased during the latest reporting period.

The pairing therefore offers two different ways to own the same buildout. Oracle takes cloud utilization and customer risk. Vertiv sells infrastructure into the build cycle itself. Oracle's latest results make its capex easier to defend, but Vertiv's ability to monetize power and cooling constraints across multiple cloud providers gives it the more diversified second-order AI thesis.

While we acknowledge the potential of ORCL and VRT as investments, we believe certain other AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

READ NEXT:

The Trillion-Dollar AI Capex Gap: Why Too Much Hardware Could Be Nvidia's Trap and Microsoft's Opportunity and Redditors Are Skeptical of SpaceX's Orbital Data Centers. Are They Right?

Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.