FNCL vs. FTXO: Which Financial Sector ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors?

Andy Gould, The Motley Fool

Mon, August 24, 2026 at 7:22 PM GMT+3 5 min read

^GSPC -0.15%

Investors weighing exposure to financial stocks often have to choose between a wide-net sector fund and a narrower, rules-based strategy. The Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FNCL) tracks a broad basket of U.S. financial firms, while the First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (NASDAQ:FTXO) takes a more targeted approach to bank stocks, using a liquidity- and volatility-weighted model.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

FNCL is the far cheaper option, with an expense ratio of 0.08% versus 0.60% for FTXO -- a 0.52 percentage-point gap that can meaningfully impact returns over long holding periods. In terms of dividends, FTXO offers a 1.72% yield compared to FNCL's 1.56%.

Performance & risk comparison

What's inside

Launched in 2013, FNCL aims to replicate the MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index, spreading its assets across 387 holdings. Its largest positions include JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) at 10.4%, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKB) at 7.8%, and Visa (NYSE:V) at 6.8%.

FTXO holds a much tighter basket of 49 stocks. The fund tracks the Nasdaq US Smart Banks Index, which selects banks based on net income, return on assets, momentum, and book value. The ETF's top holdings include Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) at 8.6%, Citigroup (NYSE:C) at 8.3%, and JPMorgan Chase at 8.1%. FTXO was launched in 2016.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

The right choice here comes down to how much banking-specific risk an investor wants to take on.

FTXO isn't just a financial sector fund -- it's a bank fund. That's a meaningful distinction, since banks are more directly exposed to interest rate swings, credit cycles, and regulatory shifts than the diversified mix of insurers, payment networks, and asset managers that fill out FNCL's portfolio. That narrower focus helps explain why FTXO has trailed FNCL's five-year returns while carrying a much deeper maximum drawdown -- concentrated bets tend to swing harder, for better or worse.

That said, the more recent trend tells a different story. Over the past 12 months, FTXO has outpaced FNCL by a wide margin, climbing roughly 25% versus FNCL's 11%. That kind of reversal isn't unusual for a concentrated bank fund -- when the industry catches a tailwind, whether from rate cuts, loan growth, or easing regulatory pressure, a bank-only portfolio tends to capture more of the upside than a diversified financial fund. So keep in mind FNCL's steadier five-year track record doesn't mean it will outperform over every stretch.

Cost is the other big differentiator here. FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio is about as cheap as sector investing gets, while FTXO's 0.60% fee is on the pricier side for an ETF -- that's the trade-off for its more active, factor-based approach to picking banks. Over a long holding period, that fee gap favors FNCL.

None of this makes FTXO a bad fund -- its bank-only focus and slightly higher yield could appeal to investors who specifically want to bet on the banking industry, perhaps anticipating a more favorable rate environment or loan growth cycle. But for most investors simply looking for low-cost, diversified exposure to financial stocks, FNCL's broader mandate and lower fees make it the better long-term choice, with the return and volatility data over the past five years to back it up. And for investors who'd rather not manage sector funds at all -- especially those just starting out -- a plain S&P 500 index fund can provide built-in, meaningful exposure to the financial sector without the added complexity.

Should you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Financials Index ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Financials Index ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Financials Index ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $429,223!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,317,883!*

That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by nearly 5x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of August 24, 2026.

Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Andy Gould has positions in Berkshire Hathaway and Visa. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

FNCL vs. FTXO: Which Financial Sector ETF Is the Better Buy for Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool